Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 8(8): e3105, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25144648

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Digestive damage due to Chagas disease (CD) occurs in 15-20% of patients diagnosed as a result of peristaltic dysfunction in some endemic areas. The symptoms of chronic digestive CD are non-specific, and there are numerous confounders. Diagnosis of CD may easily be missed if symptoms are not evaluated by a well trained physician. Regular tests, as barium contrast examinations, probably lack the necessary sensitivity to detect early digestive damage. METHODS: 71 individuals with T. cruzi infection (G1) and 18 without (G2) coming from Latin American countries were analyzed. They were asked for clinical and epidemiological data, changes in dietary habits, and history targeting digestive and cardiac CD symptoms. Serological tests for T. cruzi, barium swallow, barium enema, an urea breath test, and esophageal manometry were requested for all patients. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: G1 and G2 patients did not show differences in lifestyle and past history. Fifteen (21.1%) of G1 had digestive involvement. Following Rezende criteria, esophagopathy was observed in 8 patients in G1 (11.3%) and in none of those in G2. Manometry disorders were recorded in 34 G1 patients and in six in G2. Isolated hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was found in sixteen G1 patients (23.9%) and four G2 patients (28.8%). Achalasia was observed in two G1 patients. Among G1 patients, ineffective esophageal motility was seen in six (five with symptoms), diffuse esophageal spasm in two (one with dysphagia and regurgitation), and nutcracker esophagus in three (all with symptoms). There were six patients with hypertonic upper esophageal sphincter (UES) among G1. Following Ximenes criteria, megacolon was found in ten G1 patients (13.9%), and in none of the G2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of digestive chronic CD in our series was 21.1%. Dysphagia is a non-pathognomonic symptom of CD, but a good marker of early esophageal involvement. Manometry could be a useful diagnostic test in selected cases, mainly in patients with T. cruzi infection and dysphagia in whose situation barium swallow does not evidence alterations. Constipation is a common but non-specific symptom that can be easily managed. Testing for CD is mandatory in a patient from Latin America with constipation or dysphagia, and if diagnosis is confirmed, megacolon and esophageal involvement should be investigated.


Subject(s)
Chagas Disease , Esophageal Diseases , Adult , Chagas Disease/complications , Chagas Disease/epidemiology , Chagas Disease/physiopathology , Chronic Disease , Esophageal Diseases/epidemiology , Esophageal Diseases/etiology , Esophageal Diseases/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spain/epidemiology
2.
Enferm. emerg ; 12(2): 95-104, abr.-jun. 2010. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-87700

ABSTRACT

La infección por Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), agente responsable de la enfermedad de Chagas, ha estado tradicionalmente ligada a las zonas rurales de América Latina, donde es transmitido por diversas especies de chinches. Esta situación epidemiológica ha ido cambiando en el transcurso de las últimas décadas, de forma que en la actualidad la enfermedad de Chagas es una patología importada diagnosticada a nivel urbano y un problema de salud pública en países no endémicos con gran número de población inmigrante, dónde la transmisión se puede producir durante el embarazo/parto, por transfusión sanguínea o por transplante de órganos. Se estima que hasta un 20% de los pacientes con infección por T. cruzi presentan afectación del aparato digestivo, que causa importante morbilidad y que requiere un manejo y tratamiento adecuado. En el presente documento se aborda el diagnóstico, manejo y tratamiento de las manifestaciones digestivas de pacientes con infección por T. cruzi en nuestro medio (AU)


Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) infection, causal agent of Chagas’ disease, has been traditionally limited to rural areas of Latinamerica, where it is transmitted by insects belonging to different species of bugs. Due to recent trends in migration, Chagas disease is now a public health problem in urban areas of endemic countries and in non endemic countries as well, where the transmission via blood products, transplantation of infected organs, or vertical transmission is possible. It is estimated that 20% of individuals infected with T. cruzi might develop symptomatic gastrointestinal disease, which causes important morbidity and needs an adequate management and treatment. The aim of this document is to improve patient care by increasing understanding among physicians and other healthcare professionals who may be involved in the management of patients infected by T. cruzi who present with gastrointestinal symptoms (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Chagas Disease/complications , Megacolon/etiology , Esophageal Achalasia/etiology , Trypanosoma cruzi/pathogenicity , Risk Factors , Endemic Diseases , /epidemiology
4.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(3): 191-200, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19837482
5.
Acta Trop ; 111(1): 51-5, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19426663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is no longer limited to Latin America and is becoming frequent in industrialised countries in Europe and United States. METHODS: A descriptive study of Latin American immigrants in Barcelona attending two centres for imported diseases during a period of 3 years. The main outcome was the identification of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected individuals in a non-endemic country and the characterization of their clinical and epidemiological features. RESULTS: A total of 489 Latin American patients participated in the study. Forty-one percent were infected by T. cruzi, and the most frequent country of origin was Bolivia. All T. cruzi infected patients were in chronic stages of infection. 19% of cases had cardiac disorders and 9% had digestive disorders. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of participants in this study were infected by T. cruzi and various factors were found to be associated to the infection. It is important to improve clinical and epidemiological knowledge of T. cruzi infection in non-endemic countries and to develop appropriate screening and treatment protocols in these settings.


Subject(s)
Chagas Disease/epidemiology , Emigration and Immigration , Trypanosoma cruzi/isolation & purification , Adult , Animals , Chagas Disease/complications , Chagas Disease/pathology , Chagas Disease/physiopathology , Digestive System Diseases/etiology , Female , Heart Diseases/etiology , Humans , Latin America , Male , Middle Aged , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 3(2): 113-9, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19351282

ABSTRACT

A clean bowel environment is essential prior to radiological assessment of the colon. The objectives were to determine patient compliance and acceptability, physician satisfaction, overall clinical effectiveness and tolerability with the use of oral sodium phosphates (Fosfosoda) and polyethylene glycol solutions as bowel cleansing agents in a relatively large cohort of Spanish patients requiring radiologic examination of the colon. This was an observational survey involving 592 patients (> or =18 years and approximately 60% women) who received Fosfosoda or polyethylene glycol solutions according to data sheet instructions. Parameters measured included mucosal cleansing (presence of solid residues), patient acceptability (including any adverse effects to treatment) and compliance with the treatment regimen, and physician-rated satisfaction with the procedure. The date from the study demonstrated that Fosfosoda and polyethylene glycol solutions were found to be equally well tolerated in this study, although patients receiving Fosfosoda found it easier to complete the treatment regimen. Fosfosoda was significantly superior to polyethylene glycol solutions with regards to mucosal cleansing with 52% achieving an 'excellent' result compared with only 36% of the polyethylene glycol group (relative risk:1.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.82). Physician-rated assessment of the bowel cleansing procedure also significantly favored Fosfosoda (p = 0.014). In conclusion, while Fosfosoda and polyethylene glycol solutions were equally well tolerated when given to patients prior to radiologic examination of the colon, Fosfosoda was shown to be significantly more effective in terms of bowel cleansing. Based upon the available evidence this could provide significant cost benefit for Fosfosoda.


Subject(s)
Cathartics/therapeutic use , Colonography, Computed Tomographic/methods , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Cathartics/adverse effects , Colon/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Phosphates/adverse effects , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Spain , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...